Literature Review • Critique quality of the literature reviews conducted for two different types of studies- a quantitative and qualitative research. • Identify and discuss the research questions, sampling and sampling sizes, research designs (qualitative vs. quantitative), hypothesis, data collection methods, and research findings Oct 06, · Undertaking a critique of a research article may seem challenging at first, but will help you to evaluate whether the article has relevance to your own practice and workplace. Reading a single article can act as a springboard into researching the topic more widely and aids in ensuring your nursing practice remains current and is supported by existing blogger.comted Reading Time: 4 mins May 11, · Critiquing Literature Critique -- A critical evaluation or analysis, especially one dealing with works of art or literature. Source: The Free Dictionary
Literature Review Qualitative Research | Critique Literature Review
Surely the article will be of good quality if it has made it through the peer-review process? Publication do critique literature review can occur when editors only accept manuscripts that have a bearing on the direction of their own research, or reject manuscripts with negative findings. Additionally, not all peer reviewers have expert knowledge on certain subject matterswhich can introduce bias and sometimes a conflict of interest, do critique literature review.
Performing your own critical analysis of an article allows you to consider its value to you and to your workplace, do critique literature review.
Critical evaluation is defined as a systematic way of considering the truthfulness of a piece of research, its do critique literature review and how relevant and applicable they are. Considering the article under the following headings may be of some use:. You may be a better judge of this after reading the article, but the title should succinctly reflect the content of the work, stimulating readers' interest. Three to six keywords that encapsulate the main topics of the research will have been drawn from the body of the article, do critique literature review.
Similar to a recipe, the description of materials and methods do critique literature review allow others to replicate the study elsewhere if needed. It should both contain and justify the exact specifications of selection criteria, sample size, response rate and any statistics used, do critique literature review.
This will demonstrate how the study is capable of achieving its aims. Things to consider in this section are:. Results should be statistically analysed and presented in a way that an average reader of the journal will understand. Graphs and tables should be clear and promote clarity of the text. Consider whether:. Negative results are just as relevant as research that produces positive results but as mentioned previously may be omitted in publication due to editorial bias.
This should show insight into the meaning and significance of the research findings. It should not introduce any new material, do critique literature review, but should address how the aims of the study have been met. The discussion should use previous research work and theoretical concepts as the context in which the new study can be interpreted.
Any limitations of the study, including bias, should be clearly presented. You will need to evaluate whether the author has clearly interpreted the do critique literature review of the study, or whether the results could be interpreted do critique literature review way.
These should be clearly stated and will only be valid if the study was reliable, valid and used a representative sample size, do critique literature review. There may also be recommendations for further research. These should be relevant to the study, be up to date, and should provide a comprehensive list of citations within the text.
Undertaking a critique of a research article may seem challenging at first, but will help you to evaluate whether the article has relevance to your own practice and workplace.
Reading a single article can act as a springboard into researching the topic more widely and aids in ensuring your nursing practice remains current and is supported by existing literature. This site complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information: Verify here. Log In Join Ausmed. Online CPD Latest Online CPD Learning Hubs Online Courses Video Lectures Guides to Practice Articles Explainers Podcasts Providers Subscribe Ausmed for Organisations Events Discover All Events Browse by Topic Browse by Location My Events Why Ausmed?
Documenting Compliance Learning Pricing Ausmed App Self Care Search CPD. Start my Subscription. Log In. Create Free Account. Online CPD Learning Hubs Online Courses Video Lectures Guides to Practice Articles Explainers Podcasts Providers. Online CPD Articles How to Critique a Research Article.
Claim 3m of CPD. Unfortunately, this is not always the case. Keywords Three to six keywords that encapsulate the main topics of the research will have been drawn from the body of the article. Introduction This should include: Evidence of a literature review that is relevant and recent, critically appraising other works rather than merely describing them; Background information on the study to orientate the reader to the problem; Hypothesis or aims of the study; and Rationale for the study that justifies its need, i.
to explore an un-investigated gap in the literature. Materials and Methods Similar to a recipe, the description of materials and methods will allow others to replicate the study elsewhere if needed. Things to consider in this section are: What sort of sampling technique and size was used?
What proportion of the eligible sample participated? was the survey sent only in English? What were the strengths and weaknesses of the study? Were there threats to the reliability and validity of the study and were these controlled for? Were there any obvious biases? If a trial was undertaken, was it randomised, case controlled, blinded or double-blinded? Results Results should be statistically analysed and presented in a way that an average reader of the journal will understand.
Consider whether: There were any major omissions in the results, which could indicate bias; Percentages have been used to disguise small sample sizes; and The data generated is consistent with the data collected.
Discussion This should show insight into the meaning and significance of the research findings. Conclusions These should be clearly stated and will only be valid do critique literature review the study was reliable, valid and used a representative sample size. References These should be relevant to the study, be up to date, and should provide a comprehensive list of citations within the text.
Final Thoughts Undertaking a critique of a research article may seem challenging at first, but will help you to evaluate whether the article has relevance to your own practice and workplace, do critique literature review. Sarah Vogel See Educator Profile. Help and Feedback FAQs Make a Content Suggestion Contact Us Company About Us Our Story The Team Ausmed for Organisations Brand Guide CPD Guide.
Online CPD Latest CPD Online Courses Video Lectures Guides to Practice Articles Explainers Podcasts Learning Hubs All Topics All Resources Search. Features Overview Learning Smartphone App Partner With Ausmed 'Document CPD' Do critique literature review Documentation Self-Care on Ausmed.
Legals Terms and Conditions Privacy Policy Legals Position Statements.
Critiquing a journal article
, time: 3:18
More and more students are required to perform a critical literature review as part of their undergraduate or postgraduate studies. Whilst most of the latest research methods textbooks advise how to do a literature search, very few cover the literature review. This paper covers two types of review: a critical literature review and a systematic Jun 24, · Critique the literature Critiquing the literature involves looking at the strength and weaknesses of the paper and evaluating the statements made by the author/s. Books and resources on reading criticallyAuthor: Marianne Sato critiquing the literature, critical analysis, reviewing the literature, evaluation and appraisal of the literature which are in essence the same thing (Bassett and Bassett, ). Terminology in research can be confusing for the novice research reader where a term like 'random' refers to an organized manner of selecting items or participants, and the
No comments:
Post a Comment